Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Musings...

Much has been made about the alleged brilliance of my writing and the way it intimidates or at least comes across as a daunting task to comment. I fear you people build me up into something more than I am. I write, a lot, and often. Hundreds of documents a month, dozens of pieces a week and most of it never sees any exposure beyond the initial authoring. It’s an expected facet of investing this much time in something that you invariably end up getting somewhat good at it. But the point I’m trying to make is that I’m not the best, I’m not the supreme writer of the age, I’m simply above average and in that there is still a measure of banality.

I’m not saying this to elicit responses of praise or contradiction. I’m comfortable with my skill as a auteur and I don’t need validation in that, what I do want is comments that tell me I’m reaching and audience. Something to let me know that I have readers, that there are souls out there willing to read and endure my usually far too personal drivel and take something away from it. It’s not a competition and no one is judging or keeping score. I ran into this when I had the “Old Domain” where I would have readers that would never comment, never respond, but they would stealthily troll around and read but never say anything and then feel hurt or betrayed if I called them out on something.

Now all that having been said, please just comment on any facet of anything, even something as mundane as a smiley face or a one word response to the effect of “Nice read too many big words!” I would take. It means I’m reaching you. I do this as much for me as for you. If I stop getting feedback then it becomes just another journal and I don’t need another one. Between the pieces that never get published, my Deviant Art Journal and of course the leather bound diary I carry with me, I’ve got more than enough venues for personal matters to be discussed. When I sit down to author something for this particular forum I write it to you guys, not myself, not as a means of achieving catharsis but as a way to connect with you. But it works both ways guys. I stop getting, I stop giving. I do owe thanks, however, to Nikki (not to be confused with Nicole, I got one email asking if they were the same person. Not even close. Nikki is awesome, Nicole is from a circle of hell so deep and depraved that even Lucifer doesn’t dare go in), Justina, and Christine for subscribing, and commenting. Also shout outs are due to Immortal Aurora who has been absent due primarily to computer issues. Sorry but playing catch up will be hell.

Now that we have all of the pleasantries out of the way, let’s get down to something we can all relate and identify with instead of just my pointless whining. Today’s topic is the absurd way that we as a culture and a society have complicated interpersonal romantic relationships and the perversion that we’ve turned marriage into. If we strip away all of the new age bullshit about marriage being the ultimate commitment between two people who love each other with all their hearts what are we really left with? The answer is not one you’re going to like. The institution of marriage came about because it was a way for men to assert sexual ownership rights over women and claim them as property. It wasn’t a deep heartfelt symbol of undying love; it was a way for women to be controlled under the pretense that if they slept with anyone else or were in any way unfaithful an invisible man in the sky would strike them down. Men would take ownership of a woman by marrying her and she would be made to raise his children, service his needs (both domestic and sexual) and care for him home while he was off spreading his seed free of consequence.

Marriage has since evolved into something a bit more palatable to our social norms by being seen as the logical progression of a relationship between two people that have enough common not to kill each other after prolonged periods of time in the same room. The main reason for this progression The sad thing is that the concept of an undying, all consuming, completely fulfilling love that satisfies and contents is something seen more in fairy tales and cheesy romance novels. It does exist; don’t get me wrong, I’m the best example of a die hard romantic I’ve ever found. I tolerate and endure more than anyone else I know to try to make relationships work. I’ll allow myself to be victimized, ignored, cheated on (to an extent, see one of the other posts), introduced as a “friend” when she’s too confused or concerned to identify me as anything else, hell I don’t even take issue with the idea of the ex being a part of her life. I told Nicole on numerous occasions that if we ended up together I wouldn’t mind her continuing her association with Matthew, with a good measure of stipulations tacked onto that of course. But the point I’m getting at here is that for better or for worse when I fall in love with someone, it’s a complete and all encompassing thing. I don’t cheat, I don’t stray, and I will go to any length I have to in order to make her happy. The problem I’m finding though is that as much as women claim they want a guy who’s going to do this kind of thing for them, when they get around me they become incredibly afraid and intimidated by it.

So here lies the quandary. What is it exactly men are supposed to do when nothing they do is right? I mean I give, I sacrifice and I get shit on for all of my effort. But guys like my best friend have carnival prizes for the women he sleeps with that he awards based on their performance in bed and he’s one woman shy of hitting number one hundred. Now I know the argument by most of you is going to be that those women are dumb, and let me stop you and just clarify here. Those women who have slept with him, yeah, they’re not dumb, they’re completely fucking retarded. Most of them don’t even qualify as high functioning retards either. They’re seven shades of fucking stupid and should really have their lives reevaluated and begin to implement some kind of change. Nothing against him, but let’s face it, he’s a whore. Back to the point, why is it that a guy who tries to do everything right, who listens, takes notes, never forgets a birthday (I still call the first girl I ever dated on her birthday every year), suffers through Christmas and the awkward exchange of gifts, even makes a concerted effort to appear presentable and publicly acceptable when meeting parents or family, get nothing in return for his efforts?

Relationships have evolved into these incredibly complicated things where you need a score card and commentary by John Madden and Pat Summerall just to keep up. There’s all these arbitrary terms, friends with benefits, sex with no strings attached, one night stand, fuck buddy, casual dating, just dating, kind of together, talking, seeing each other, together, not together, exclusive, open relationship and really it’s all bullshit. You need an example?

Friends with benefits: this is every good friendship, otherwise why be friends? I benefit from hanging out with you if for no other reason than I’m not bored.

Sex with no strings attached: Awesome I love sex when I don’t have strings grafted into my skin. It makes moving much easier and I feel a lot less like a marionette.

One night stand: Do I really need to go into how fucking stupid this one is? Odds are unless you’ve got her back pressed against the wall, all the fucking you’re doing for that one night is on a bed and you’re both lying down. No one is standing unless the jackass with the cock is standing in the door way with his dick in his hand hoping you brought a friend.

Fuck buddy: if you don’t know the person well enough to even call them a buddy before you take them into your bed, odds are you should be hoping for a one night stand.

Casual dating: am I to understand that there is another kind of dating; perhaps some kind of sudden death dating or high tension dating? If he says the wrong thing he gets shot in the face. If she forgets when her period starts she’s flayed alive.

Just dating: you buy dinner, take her home, and then you go home to rub one out because you’re just dating so sex is out of the question. After all you’re not friends with benefits and you’re certainly not fuck buddies. You’re just dating!

Kind of together: well you’ve been seen in the same place, at the same time, talking to each other. You were even caught kissing on a couple of occasions. But you’re only kind of together. Wouldn’t want to send the wrong idea after all, make someone think that there might be more going on.

Talking: this is really fucking stupid. I talk to hundreds of people a week. Doesn’t mean I’m trying to fuck any of them!

Seeing each other: I open my eyes, look across the room, and happen to make eye contact. The light is interpreted by my brain as visual signals and I see you. The same process occurs in your brain, unless you’re blind at which point stop staring at me! We’ve seen each other, now let’s become friends with benefits!

Together: well thank god you’re together! I’d hate to think you’re in need of assembly. I’ll try to find the instructions from Ikea and we’ll get you done up right. Let me get the special tool that came in the box.

Not together: well I couldn’t find the tool, and the instructions are in some bastard version of Swedish so I guess you’re not together. Sorry.

Exclusive: I don’t recall ever being asked to sign a contract with a girl. But maybe I should start. If she goes to work any one else’s knob or does work for an agent other than myself she’s broken my exclusive contract. I’ll sue god-dammit!

Open relationship: the door is always open for you to leave. Don’t like doing things my way, get the fuck out of here!

These terms are completely useless and stupid. They don’t mean a fucking thing. We assign them special little meanings and talk in this bullshit language because really when you strip away all of the infidelity, the cons, the games, the flirting, and the exorbitant amount of effort that some guy through just for a single piece of ass, how exciting is sex really? It’s hard enough getting each other’s clothes off what with women wearing pants that are painted on these days, and then half the time the guy can’t even figure out what he’s doing and looks like he’s having a seizure in a Mel Brooks movie. But if done right, sex is this messy, hot, sweaty, lurid, loud, debauched act engaged in by two people for what is believed will be mutual physical satisfaction. But we dress it up and add all manner of pretentiousness to it and it becomes something that doesn’t get done without the right amount of alcohol, or the right encouragement from friends, or the right amount of trust. And really if you’re bedding down with that person anyway, as convoluted as dating has become in today’s world, you should care about them enough and have at least a little bit of genuine romantic attachment to really open up, relax, and just enjoy the ministrations of your partner.

6 comments:

  1. Lol.
    I'm speechless.

    I'll comment on this in the different parts you have.

    1. Yes, you seriously have a gift with words. That, or you spend too much time editing your prose. Either way, I comment because you encourage discussion. There's really not much discussion from my end, I usually look at pretty things and say, "how pretty." &it ends. But I'll try to provide thoughtful feedback & what your writing invokes.

    2. Yes, marriage was originally pretty sexist. But in way, it was also to protect the woman. When a girl and a guy do the deed, it's for procreation. Procreation is about 5 minutes of a guy's time. Maybe 15. On the other hand, it is about 9 months of a woman's time... more if you count the nursing. So in a way, marriage is good for the girl because it sort of guilts the man into taking care of her and her offspring.. for a bit, anyway. Doesn't always turn out that way. Tons of deadbeat dads.. but I'm not going to complain, they are the reason why I will still have a job in the future!

    3. You are probably just going after the wrong girls. Or maybe you're doing everything right but doing things that are wrong too, and those wrongs outweigh the right? Or maybe you're looking for the wrong type of girl. The qualities you described in yourself are very long-term relationship-y.
    &while you may think your best friend is a whore, I would disagree (to a certain point). I would say he just likes to have sex, and he decided that the easiest way to do so is to burn through women so he doesn't have to deal with the shit AFTER the deed (the crying, the calling, the courting). If that's your style, Nick, then you can't be nice and sweet and you don't need to try and "do anything right" because the right thing to do (to just have sex) is to.. do nothing.
    So decide what you are looking for and then go for it.

    4. All those terms.. your definitions made me LOL.
    I would simplify it.

    1. A person you know just to fuck.
    2. A person you know because they are your friend.
    3. A person you know that you would like to fuck.
    4. A person you love that loves you. You may or may not be fucking them, and that may or may not be your choice.
    5. A person that you are married to.

    So..
    1. Fuckbuddies, 2. Friends, 3. Dating, 4. Relationship, 5. Marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. well i've decided on celibacy. i'm done with the headgames and bullshit. no woman is worth the shit i've put up with. weeks on end with no contact, no direct response to my attempts at contact. and then the clandestine dealings that they think go unnoticed. believe me, i'm like House, i notice everything. oh well, their loss. I'm taking myself off the market completely for a while.

    as for my whore friend, no he's a whore. he'll admit he's a whore. he seeks sex and nothing else. no connection, no relationship, just bump, grind, spurt. i don't envy him for that i just don't understand how he's able to pull it off so easily with no consequences while i sit idly by trying make relationships work with women that couldn't care less about me.

    maybe a total ass is just what women like. a guy that regards them as objects, has no concern for their feelings, and no problem looking at them as toys to satisfy their sexual needs. maybe my problem is that all the women i've been after like guys that care little to nothing about their feelings instead of putting their feelings first. i'll need to consider it

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why not just do what your whore friend does, silly? Sex with no connection and no relationships? It's pretty easy. lol. &the women wouldn't care less about you, just like you wouldn't care about them. Perfect!

    &any smart girl will go for the guy that considers them first. Trust me on this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. the problem with that precept is that is puts forth the idea that the women i go for are lacking in intelligence. while it might be that i'm simply defending them out of personal bias, they're not stupid, just confused or lacking in conviction which annoys me far more than if they were just retarded.

    as for the idea of me just objectifying women or getting laid, no strings attached, i could never do it. i thrive on connection, on feeling valued. i need that in any sexual encounter. i'm one of the biggest flirts on the planet but i'm not a whore. i have to feel something for the person or i just can't do it. end of story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I enjoyed reading this post. Thanks for the shout-out. =)

    I'm not saying this because I think the same way (scorpio's unite!), but I agree with your last comment:

    "as for the idea of me just objectifying women or getting laid, no strings attached, i could never do it. i thrive on connection, on feeling valued. i need that in any sexual encounter. i'm one of the biggest flirts on the planet but i'm not a whore. i have to feel something for the person or i just can't do it. end of story."


    That's me to the tee, and it's refreshing to see that come from a male for once.

    I'll write you tomorrow about this, I think you touched on a lot of good points that most men tend to ignore, or are completely oblivious to.

    You are far beyond your time, Nick. I appreciate it, and really look forward to reading your posts.. They're not only educational (regarding the political stuff) but also inspiring and help me to realize what is important in our lives.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'll need to keep my computer issues to a low cause my head is doing a little bit of spinning, so much in such a short time but I've enjoyed them all and are glad that you have another site, I was an avid fan of the Old Domain and just as much for the new one. I will always comment even though most of the things that come out of my mouth is dumb. lol

    LMAO, I loved the terms you gave for all the different types of "relationships". What I've said in the past still stands....CUT THE BULL SHIT and it'll all work out.

    I dont know really what my "relationship" is with my lover but I've cut the BS and we have a great time. We care for eachother and the sex is awesome and we're both content in that.

    Marrige is pointless. I say just live together and give the girl a damn ring to make her feel special and in return you'll have a great life. Many people who get married dont make it past the 3 year mark while others, who just live with one another in a common law marrige, are extreamly successfull.

    ps
    sorry for misspellings, trying to read and comment as fast as a can and so I dont care to re read and correct.

    ReplyDelete